<VV> Buick/Olds/Rover aluminum engines
jvhroberts at aol.com
jvhroberts at aol.com
Wed Mar 26 06:58:23 EDT 2014
Nah. Too much cutting, etc. Either go mid engine with a G50 gearbox, or go rear engine, also with a G50 gearbox!!
John Roberts
-----Original Message-----
From: Jay Maechtlen <jaysplace at laserpubs.com>
To: virtualvairs <virtualvairs at corvair.org>
Sent: Wed, Mar 26, 2014 1:11 am
Subject: Re: <VV> Buick/Olds/Rover aluminum engines
From what I've seen, transverse might not be too bad in a LM.
In an early, you have to be willing to cut - a lot. And that's for a V6.
On 3/25/2014 1:17 PM, jvhroberts at aol.com wrote:
> Or, go with the modern LSx engines, which are WAY more powerful, WAY more
available, and don't weigh much more. And the LS4 is a bit more compact than
most, since it's FWD version.
>
>
> John Roberts
>
--
Jay Maechtlen SoCal '61 2-dr modified w/fiberglass skin, transverse 3.8
Buick V6 TH440T4 trans
_______________________________________________
This message was sent by the VirtualVairs mailing list, all copyrights are the
property
of the writer, please attribute properly. For help, mailto:vv-help at corvair.org
This list sponsored by the Corvair Society of America, http://www.corvair.org/
Post messages to: VirtualVairs at corvair.org
Change your options: http://www.vv.corvair.org/mailman/options/virtualvairs
_______________________________________________
More information about the VirtualVairs
mailing list