<VV> DIFFERENTIAL RATIO COMMENTS
jvhroberts at aol.com
jvhroberts at aol.com
Sun Jan 29 08:15:17 EST 2012
Technically, the differential is 1:1. The final drive, however, is what you're talking about.
Had an FC once. 3.55 is the way to go here. 3.89 would be better.
John Roberts
-----Original Message-----
From: N2VZD <N2VZD at aol.com>
To: virtualvairs <virtualvairs at corvair.org>
Sent: Sun, Jan 29, 2012 7:28 am
Subject: Re: <VV> DIFFERENTIAL RATIO COMMENTS
I am now not sure if I want a 3:55 or a 3:27 in my rampy. I have a 3:27
in it now running ok with a 95hp powerglide. I just parted out a 64 FC WB
110hp with powerglide and 3:55. I am building a new motor from scratch for it
, using the correct 64 FC powerglide . Now I am thinking maybe I might like
the 3:55 better on hills etc, without THAT much difference in fuel
economy..?? I plan on driving it quite a bit in good weather on all kinds of
roads. Has anyone used both , and can comment on this? I have the 3:27 in
it for a while now for thruway cruising and fuel mileage , but raw hills
south of here are a slight challenge.
Yes I will be resealing and checking the 3:55 out carefully.
Regards , Tim Colson "still playing with Corvairs"
_______________________________________________
This message was sent by the VirtualVairs mailing list, all copyrights are the
property
of the writer, please attribute properly. For help, mailto:vv-help at corvair.org
This list sponsored by the Corvair Society of America, http://www.corvair.org/
Post messages to: VirtualVairs at corvair.org
Change your options: http://www.vv.corvair.org/mailman/options/virtualvairs
_______________________________________________
More information about the VirtualVairs
mailing list