<VV> Weber IDAs? Dellortos?
levair at aol.com
levair at aol.com
Tue Jan 23 14:17:43 EST 2007
I once did a down draft progressive Weber IDA for a Solo Vee Autocrosser.
That would be 1600ccs for the carb. It did cure the off idle problems but was not a great advantage for a foot to the floor autocrosser.
Warren
-----Original Message-----
From: Sethracer at aol.com
To: JWCorvair at aol.com; virtualvairs at corvair.org; fastvair at yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:58 PM
Subject: Re: <VV> Weber IDAs? Dellortos?
In a message dated 1/22/2007 4:46:36 PM Pacific Standard Time,
jwcorvair at aol.com writes:
Is anyone running a pair of dual throat IDAs on their engine where the IDA
is attached to the manifold through an adapter to the single carb mount? Has
anyone modified the manifold on a Corvair cylinder head to accept a dual
throat IDA? I know that Warren LeVeque offers a DCOE modified for progressive
operation on turbo engines; has anyone modified an IDA for progressive
operation? (Basically the same carb, just vertical instead of horizontal.)
In my experience, this would be a competition only set-up. I have seen two
cars run that set up, the two down-draft 40 IDA 2-barrels, although,
technically, each carb fed a plenum that then fed the cylinders witha separate
tube.
Sort of like the bolt-on, but the plenum was lifted higher off the motor. Both
cars were race cars. The first one was the "Silver Fox"an SCCA winning tube
framed sports racer with a mid-engined Corvair. It was converted to a
Holley-carbed supercharged set-up, as it remains today, I believe. The
carb/manifold
set up was installed on Louie Lira's 64 autocross car. I believe he has
moved away from it, but I am not sure, I haven't seen the car run in several
years. I ran a similar set-up on a Street-Prepared autocross Corvair. I used
Dellorto 40 MM downdrafts - almost a clone of the 40 IDA Weber, with small
stacks
adapting them to the stock carb pads. However, since, at the time, nobody
was converting the Webers (or Dellortos) to progressive operation, in order to
have any off throttle operation, the secondary chokes in the carbs had to be
greatly reduced in size from how they were operated in a tuned port (single
port per cylinder) operation. When a balance had been reached, I was down to
around 28-30mm chokes - around 1 and one-quarter inches. Sound familiar? All
out performance was on a par with a set of good Rochesters. Cornering power
was definitely better. But the car was very cold-blooded, and, although it
would keep running on start-up, still had poor off idle throttle response. Woe
to
the driver that tried to sneak away from the line. It would just die, unless
the hammer was dropped with the RPM up. (Fun, actually, but not for the
street) I can testify that it is the same effect that you see when all four
Rochesters are ganged to open together. I would attempt this setup only if
progressive linkage was installed on each carb, or if you are using Fuel
injection
throttle bodies to serve up the correct fuel mixture, instead of carbs. - Seth
Emerson
_______________________________________________
This message was sent by the VirtualVairs mailing list, all copyrights are the
property
of the writer, please attribute properly. For help, mailto:vv-help at corvair.org
This list sponsored by the Corvair Society of America, http://www.corvair.org/
Post messages to: VirtualVairs at corvair.org
Change your options: http://www.vv.corvair.org/mailman/options/virtualvairs
_______________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web, free AOL Mail and more.
More information about the VirtualVairs
mailing list