<VV> Re: Cooling fans
JVHRoberts at aol.com
JVHRoberts at aol.com
Mon Aug 6 03:58:09 EDT 2007
Aluminum. Investment casting. The cheapest way to make small runs, and it's
GREAT for casting thin sections! Heck, you can even have magnesium cast this
way...
In a message dated 8/6/2007 12:19:37 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
ScottyGrover at aol.com writes:
Hi Scotty,
If you’re really going to get into this, I think you’re bound to find out
that an aluminum pattern has to be made larger than the intended final
size,
to account for shrinkage. So using an original steel fan would yield a part
that was smaller than original dimensions. I think the pattern has to be
1.2
times the intended final size.
I work in aircraft and automotive composites and have been reading the fan
discussion over the last week. It occurred to me that making a mold of the
original ’61 fan, top and bottom, then duplicating the vanes in flat stock,
would allow for a detailed, but exact duplicate of the original fan
assembly that
would be much lighter, especially if the laminate used was carbon fiber
with
a high-temp resin. A carbon fiber assembly could be as little as ¼ of the
present steel weight.
So, as you examine your options tomorrow, consider this as an alternate way
of getting the fan we need for modern Corvair performance cooling. With
composites, we can run as many vanes as needed, at any angle desired, even
curved
vanes! A fixture can be used to mill slots in the upper and lower shells
that
the vanes key into, and a high-temp adhesive used to do the final assembly
of all the parts.
Just something to think about…….
Regards, Mel Francis
Oconomowoc, WI
************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
More information about the VirtualVairs
mailing list