<VV> Corvair Fan
JVHRoberts at aol.com
JVHRoberts at aol.com
Sun Jul 10 16:47:50 EDT 2005
Given that ALL turbo Corvairs overheat if you keep your foot into it long
enough, AC Corvairs seem to struggle in hot weather, and 140 HP Corvairs run
better cold than hot, I'd say it's inadequate, and Chevy opted for a one size
fits all solution that only works on the lowest HP models. The more powerful
engines simply need better cooling than Chevy gave them. And regardless of your
reverse logic, the market demand for air conditioning and more power was
clearly there. No need for water cooling, just a better fan.
Parts cost over the counter will ALWAYS be a LOT higher than the
manufacturing costs. By a BUNCH. The revision to the 1961 cooling system was done to
accomodate the Direct Air heater, a cost savings over the gasoline fired unit.
So, why is the stock cooling system marginal on the high output and AC
engines? Simple, Chevy never designed the right cooling system parts for these
engines.
In a message dated 7/10/2005 4:41:23 PM Eastern Standard Time,
crawfordrose at msn.com writes:
I recall that Chevrolet stated that the fan redesign was to eliminate belt
retention problems arising from heavy steel fans only, not to enhance cooling.
I am not aware of any publication that claims that the fan was redesigned to
improve cooling only to reduce inertia on changes of engine speed. The
design of the original fan was conventional to the Porsche and VW fans in use at
that time. Therefore, the supposition that the fan as designed (or even as
redesigned) is inadequate is not a well founded premise. Is it not more correct
to state that burdensome air conditioning condensers, turbochargers and
large valve heads are inadequate for the small Corvair engine? Why fuss with
designing a new fan when a "better" cooling system of air and water jackets for
liquid cooling could easily be designed but then, it is no longer the Corvair
cooling system. I never had a problem with my 64 Spyder's cooling system
which worked as designed, at speeds of up to 90 mph, for 124,000 miles.
Finally, what was so cheap about the cooling system? The total cost of all
shrouds, seals, parts, and fan (itself $6.25 when minimum wage was less than
$1.00) was $85.56 in 1960. The engine in a crate was 450.00. The cooling
system was simplified thereafter to include bilateral thermostats damper doors,
probably for no significant cost savings.
More information about the VirtualVairs
mailing list