<VV> successes with ignitor?

[Bill Elliott]

In a perfectly maintained, perfect condition stock ignition system, you should not see any significant performance difference with an Ignitor. However, 
very few us of have perfect systems... a common malady seeming to be varying dwell due to distributor wear... and the Ignitor quickly and easily solves 
this problem. 

In addition, the Igintor allows the use of a higher voltage coil. Some of the well-respected experts here will tell you that running a higher voltage coil is 
not necessary, but in my "real world" experience, I have noted a significant improvement with one. Possibly I would have seen the same improvement 
with a fresh stock coil... but with a Flamethrower at $27-30, why not go with that?

Overall improvements from the upgraded ignition package incluse much easier starting, slightly smoother idle, and more robust acceleration from 
3000rpm-redline. (All of my Corvair distributors had some dwell variance... this last advantage would have likely been solved by a fresh points distributor 
as well.)

I run Ignitors not only in my Corvairs, but most of my LBC's as well... I have never had a failure... and I strongly believe that the vast majority of the 
failures you hear about were (1) the very first generation which had brittle wires and (2) Ignitor I's running off the ballasted power source.

I have both Ignitors I and II. Honestly, I cannot tell any signifcant difference in the two... but I'm a big enough believer in the science behind them (and 
the thought that the Iginitor II may be a bit more robust) that in the future when I buy an Ignitor, I will buy a II... but I will not pull out a perfectly fine 
Ignitor I just to upgrade to a II.

My advice for the best "bang for the buck" ignition system for a street Corvair? Ignitor II (hooked up to a pure 12v power source) with 40kV 
Flamethrower coil, a set of Seth's wires, a quality cap and rotor (I really like The Source bits here), and a $6 set of W8AC Bosch Supers. This should 
supply more ignition than would ever be necessary for the street.  

A turbo puts a lot more stress on the ignition system... and an Ignitor should provide plenty of spark for any situation where the stock system _may_ be 
more marginal.

Bill Elliott 
Urbana, MD

>I am thinking about putting a pertronix ignitor or ignitor II system on 
>my '64 spyder coupe. I mainly want to do this to eliminate the hassle 
>of adjusting point gap and checking points and setting dwell and all 
>that other fiddly stuff. Have there been any real performance or other 
>differences in engine characteristics with the ignitor or the ignitor 
>II (in case you don;t know the ignitor II also has variable dwell in 
>the circuitry) with the '64 turbo 150? How about the '62 102hp since I 
>also have a monza convertible that I am thinking of adding the system 
>to as well. The monza has a stock coil. The spyder has an MSD coil on 
>it, but it is NOT electronic. It just carries the MSD brand name.

>Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
>_______________________________________________