[FC] Not Springs but "working" Rampside engine

[J. R. Read]

Gee, I could swear that Hank said it was to be a 110.  What did I miss?

Maybe he said 110 with 95 heads?  Better yet for a "working" Rampside.

Later, JR

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Doc via Corvanatics" <corvanatics at corvair.org>
To: <corvanatics at corvair.org>; <joel at joelsplace.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 2:18 PM
Subject: [FC] Springs for "working" Rampside


> Joel,
>
> I always enjoy when someone tells of their isolated experience to refute a
> broader concept.  I do it too, though I try to avoid it when I realize I 
> am
> doing it.
>
> Here is my logic on the subject.
>

"GIANT" CUT here. 


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com