<VV> Corvair and Mustang
frankcb at aol.com
frankcb at aol.com
Tue Jan 6 13:07:30 EST 2015
Reminds me that on page 26 in the new (February) issue of Popular Mechanics magazine, it states that "independent rear suspension is now standard across the lineup (of Ford cars)". Since some of the Fords now have turbocharging it also says "Turbocharging and independent rear suspension? Is this a Mustang or BMW?" I'm tempted to write them and add "Or a 50 year old Chevrolet CORVAIR like I have sitting in my garage?"
Welcome to the modern world, Ford
Frank Burkhard
Boonton, NJ
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill H. via VirtualVairs <virtualvairs at corvair.org>
To: virtualvairs <virtualvairs at corvair.org>
Sent: Tue, Jan 6, 2015 10:51 am
Subject: <VV> Corvair and Mustang
B"H
The cancellation of the Corvair was the result of a complex series of factors,
as I see it. Of course, the bean counters in any corporation have a strong say
in what that company makes and sells, and we all know that the Vair was the most
expensive product in the GM lineup to build. Sure, it had great potential to
become a fine touring car in the GT tradition, but I think GM saw a cheap and
easy way to sell a sporty, sexy looking car by slapping the Camaro body onto to
a Nova platform. But back as early as '63, Ford tested the waters (pre-Mustang)
with dandied up Falcons that got hardtop styling, bucket seats, and the
Fairlane's small block V8. They sold and prompted Chevy to eventually offer the
SBC in the Chevy II (which also had an SS model back in '62, albeit it was 6
cylinder only).
Detroit's compacts, except for the Corvair, were simply 7/8 scale models of the
standard cars, nothing more. Ed Cole was, in that light, more of a "car guy"
than Iacocca, who didn't seem to envision anything that didn't have a regular
Ford engine up front, and a solid axle and leaf springs in back. Cole wanted
true innovation, and that lead to the "car built from a blank page."
For very little money, one can transform a Corvair into a true GT car, one that
can cruise effortlessly on a long trip, handle with precision and predictably,
and give a comfortable ride to its passengers. Somehow I don't think either
Mustang or Camaro could do that in 1967 (although in later years, Camaro did
improve its roadability).
_______________________________________________
This message was sent by the VirtualVairs mailing list, all copyrights are the
property
of the writer, please attribute properly. For help, mailto:vv-help at corvair.org
This list sponsored by the Corvair Society of America, http://www.corvair.org/
Post messages to: VirtualVairs at corvair.org
Change your options: http://www.vv.corvair.org/mailman/options/virtualvairs
_______________________________________________
More information about the VirtualVairs
mailing list