<VV> 64 springs & IRS
jvhroberts at aol.com
jvhroberts at aol.com
Fri Jan 2 13:29:29 EST 2015
Tru dat...
Unneeded in LMs, as LMs are better...
:)
Discuss!
John Roberts
-----Original Message-----
From: James P. Rice via VirtualVairs <virtualvairs at corvair.org>
To: virtualvairs <virtualvairs at corvair.org>
Sent: Fri, Jan 2, 2015 12:34 pm
Subject: <VV> 64 springs & IRS
All: Jay is correct, Joel is incorrect.
Historically Yours
James Rice
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2015 18:17:16 -0800
From: Jay Maechtlen <jaysplace at laserpubs.com>
To: Joel McGregor <joel at joelsplace.com>, "virtualvairs at corvair.org"
<virtualvairs at corvair.org>
Subject: Re: <VV> IRS
On 12/31/2014 11:50 AM, Joel McGregor via VirtualVairs wrote:
> BTW- the transverse leaf was not intended as a springing device. That was
just a consequence of the design. It was actually a sway bar instead of an
anti-sway bar similar to the old Z-bars in intent.
> Let the flames begin on "solid".
>
> Joel McGregor
No. It is a springing device, to permit softer main springs and
correspondingly lower roll stiffness.
Jay Maechtlen
SoCal
'61 2-dr modified w/fiberglass skin,
transverse 3.8 Buick V6 TH440T4 trans
******
_______________________________________________
This message was sent by the VirtualVairs mailing list, all copyrights are the
property
of the writer, please attribute properly. For help, mailto:vv-help at corvair.org
This list sponsored by the Corvair Society of America, http://www.corvair.org/
Post messages to: VirtualVairs at corvair.org
Change your options: http://www.vv.corvair.org/mailman/options/virtualvairs
_______________________________________________
More information about the VirtualVairs
mailing list