<VV> Thermister Swap?
mike & bev mann
vair65 at sisna.com
Mon Sep 8 10:52:50 EDT 2014
A couple of points to remember
1-Gauge and thermister was designed and built in the 60's and the quality
is probably no better then +-20% which is a large error at 500 degrees.
2-thermister probably uses a nichrome wire wire which as the heat increses
would cause the resistance in the wire to increase and thus the reading in
the guage would rise. The air mass sensor in my efi works on the same
principle as more air goes by the "hot wire" the resistance is increased
causing the ecu to send more fuel to the engine.
3-You are dealing with a varable resistor!
4-I happen to use westech guages and sendors and they have a sender that is
a direct bolt in for a Corvair but both the guage and sender must be used
to get correct reading. These are aircraft approved instruments so the
quality is much better than the stock guages.
Mike Mann
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Sethracer--- via VirtualVairs <
virtualvairs at corvair.org> wrote:
> A couple of things struck me, reading the last few posts on the thermistor.
> I have a copy of Herb's characteristic curve for the sender. Herb isn't
> around to ask his sampling methods, but it would be interesting to know
> the
> original design curve for this unit, not just a single sample. At least a
> few more units through test would provide more confidence that this
> represents the designed goal. The same is really true in the instrument
> area. In
> addition to the input voltage - and it would be nice to see what the real
> world provides at a Corsa dash plug under running conditions - the level
> of
> grounding of the instrument panel assembly (a Corvair 'issue" over the
> years),
> would be nice to instrument. This is all good info. - Seth
>
>
> In a message dated 9/7/2014 6:03:10 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
> virtualvairs at corvair.org writes:
>
> I've done some more research on the Corsa thermistor, stock gauge and the
> Rochester thermistor and I may have been WRONG in my earlier posting
> saying
> that the Rochester thermistor with a fixed resistor wouldn't work.
>
> The major problem I have is that there's little data on the stock GM/AC
> Delco thermistor. There's one plot made by Herb Berkman back in 1974 of
> resistance versus temperature. There's no data I can find regarding the
> Corsa dash gauge; I think we've all assumed that GM designed the gauge to
> match the thermistor characteristic curve.
>
> Since there was little information on the thermistor, and I don't have a
> handful to make new measurements from, I decided to back into the problem
> and see what the Corsa gauge "expected" to see at various temperature
> readings. At least I had three gauges to check and see if they were
> consistent. Basically I hooked up a Corsa head temp gauge and substituted
> a variable resistor and measured the the resistance needed to make the
> gauge indicate various temperatures.
>
> I was shocked by my results! If Mr. Berkman's data are correct, the stock
> Corsa setup is about correct at only 200 degs F cylinder head temp. After
> that, it reads progressively LOW. Based upon my measurements of the gauge
> response and Mr. Berkman's data, I'd estimate that at a real head temp of
> 500 F, the Corsa gauge is indicating about 350 F. That's a scary error!
> I'd rather it read too high than too low! Basically the stock Corsa gauge
> and the AC/Delco thermistor don't match each.
>
> Regarding the Rochester thermistor, the only specs I can find were
> published in a Robinson Helicopter instruments maintenance manual. (I
> can't find any specs on the Rochester web page; perhaps I just don't know
> where to look...) If the Robinson data is correct, then adding a 60 ohm
> resistor in series with the Rochester thermistor would make the stock
> Corsa
> gauge work pretty well. It would be just about right on at 500 degrees
> and
> track quite well at lower temperatures -- probably well within your
> ability
> to read it accurately. (Above 500 degrees, the Corsa gauge with
> Rochester
> thermistor + 60 ohm resistor would again read lower than the actual temp.
> But I would be backing off by the time my car's heads hit 500 F...)
>
> So I now need to get the real specs on the Rochester thermistor or
> actually
> buy one and measure it's resistance vs temperature curve.
>
> If anyone want's to see my data and analysis, drop me a note and I'll
> forward a copy of the spreadsheet with graphs.
>
> Jim Simpson
> Group Corvair
>
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 4:33 PM, MarK Durham <62vair at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Jim is exactly right. It would be accurate at one point, and less
> accurate
> > progressively along the scale going up or down from that point. That is
> why
> > I said on the EFI, it took an approximate reading to fool the computer
> in
> > switching to normal temp mode form cold start mode and a resistor did
> that.
> > The computer only needed to see an approximate value within a range.
> >
> > A guage needs to be more accurate than that.
> >
> > Guys, its this type of thing that is happening to our aging cars that
> > prompted me to suggest installing a new movement in the dash to replace
> the
> > old one, (and you keep the original look) and to install a matching new
> > thermistor in the engine, so you have correct reading gauges. If its
> CHT,
> > VDO makes a 90 degree sweep guage that could be a direct replacement
> with a
> > VDO probe. Then your CHT would be good for longer than most of us would
> > have the cars! VDO also does transmission temp or oil temp gauges.
> > Regards
> >
> >
> >
> > Mark Durham
> > Hauser, Idaho
> > 62 Monza coupe Red/Red 4 speed
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Jim Simpson via VirtualVairs <
> > virtualvairs at corvair.org> wrote:
> >
> >> The short answer is no, it won't work. The longer answer is that yes,
> you
> >> can put a suitable resistor in series with the Rochester thermistor
> and
> >> get
> >> a correct reading at one (1) temperature. Pick the temperature you
> want
> >> to
> >> be "accurate" and you could find a resistor that would give you that
> one
> >> reading.
> >>
> >> The problem is that the Rochester and GM thermistors have different
> >> temperature vs resistance curves. Even with the addition of a
> resistor,
> >> the curves will not overlay. All you can do is make them cross each
> >> other
> >> at some point.
> >>
> >> If you want to use the Rochester thermistor, you will have to make (or
> >> have
> >> made) a black box to translate from it's response curve to the gauge
> >> response curve. In principle, not a hard thing to do. But it would
> take
> >> a
> >> little time and tinkering.
> >>
> >> I've been thinking about it a little and may give it a try in my spare
> >> time
> >> in order to refresh my electronics skills. But don't hold your breath
> >> waiting for me to get it done...
> >>
> >> Jim Simpson
> >> Group Corvair
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> This message was sent by the VirtualVairs mailing list, all copyrights
> >> are the property
> >> of the writer, please attribute properly. For help, mailto:
> >> vv-help at corvair.org
> >> This list sponsored by the Corvair Society of America,
> >> http://www.corvair.org/
> >> Post messages to: VirtualVairs at corvair.org
> >> Change your options:
> >> http://www.vv.corvair.org/mailman/options/virtualvairs
> >> _______________________________________________
> >>
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> This message was sent by the VirtualVairs mailing list, all copyrights are
> the property
> of the writer, please attribute properly. For help,
> mailto:vv-help at corvair.org
> This list sponsored by the Corvair Society of America,
> http://www.corvair.org/
> Post messages to: VirtualVairs at corvair.org
> Change your options:
> http://www.vv.corvair.org/mailman/options/virtualvairs
> _______________________________________________
>
> _______________________________________________
> This message was sent by the VirtualVairs mailing list, all copyrights are
> the property
> of the writer, please attribute properly. For help, mailto:
> vv-help at corvair.org
> This list sponsored by the Corvair Society of America,
> http://www.corvair.org/
> Post messages to: VirtualVairs at corvair.org
> Change your options:
> http://www.vv.corvair.org/mailman/options/virtualvairs
> _______________________________________________
>
More information about the VirtualVairs
mailing list