<VV> [FC] best camshaft for a 110 ?

[corvairs at pacifier.com]

Daniel - You have the ultravan/aircraft scenario. For rpms at 3500 either
the stock 889 or the stock 891 will work very close to the same. Under
3300 rpms the 889 has a slight advantage over the 891.

There has been a lot of ink wasted on Isky 260, GoVair P100, Otto OT-10
for aircraft use. But the truth is, under 3400 rpms they provide no
advantage over a stock 889.

You need to do some serious thinking as to what your actual rpm usage will
be. The 3 cams just mentioned will start to give slightly better numbers
in higher rpms. (Above 3500 rpms) but are otherwise just pretty much the
same as stock - possibly even slightly weaker.

Lon
www.corvairunderground.com
>
>
> In a message dated 11/28/2012 7:23:15 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> dmonasterio at hotmail.com writes:
>
>
> I am  planing on rebuilding an spare 110 HP engine but, don't have a good
> used  camshaft for it. Will use a NOS set of pistons/cylinders (so,
> std.)Which is  the best modern camshaft I can get for it ? It will be used
> on normal
> driving,  mostly at no more than 3500 RPM.
> Thanks a lot for your input
> Daniel  Monasterio
> _______________________________________________
> Corvanatics mailing  list
> Corvanatics at corvair.org
> http://www.vv.corvair.org/mailman/listinfo/corvanatics
> This  list sponsored by the Corvair Society of America,
> http://www.corvair.org/
>
>  _______________________________________________
> This message was sent by the VirtualVairs mailing list, all copyrights are
> the property
> of the writer, please attribute properly. For help,
> mailto:vv-help at corvair.org
> This list sponsored by the Corvair Society of America,
> http://www.corvair.org/
> Post messages to: VirtualVairs at corvair.org
> Change your options:
> http://www.vv.corvair.org/mailman/options/virtualvairs
>  _______________________________________________
>
>