<VV> Fwd: Fwd: Corvair content, Really! (brakes)

[Ken Pepke]

Probably the only way to convince you would be for it to happen to you.  

Some of us learned 'a word to the wise is sufficient' while we were growing up. 
Ken P

-------------------------
 

> From: Bill Hubbell <whubbell at verizon.net>
> Date: March 24, 2011 6:41:45 AM EDT
> To: Ken Pepke <kenpepke at juno.com>
> Cc: Vair Views <virtualvairs at corvair.org>
> Subject: Re: <VV> Fwd: Corvair content, Really! (brakes)
> 
> I am still not convinced. Again, the argument being given to add a redundant system is to protect against potential failure in another system. The proper "fix" for potential rear bearing failure is to replace any suspect bearing, not to add additional complexity "just in case".  Adding redundant systems solely for the reason you mention is just as likely to lull the owner into ignoring the future maintenance of the braking or bearing systems.  
> 
> Of course, we now have a generation or more of folks who have grown up expecting other people to protect them from all of life's possible harms so I suppose this kind of thinking is now to be expected. 
> 
> Bill Hubbell
____________________________________________________________
Groupon&#8482 Official Site
1 ridiculously huge coupon a day. Get 50-90% off your city&#39;s best!
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4d8b31e6837db30c9fbst05vuc