<VV> Cams and noise: for the archives
Dennis Pleau
dpleau at wavecable.com
Fri Mar 11 00:33:16 EST 2011
I've used four cams recently. Two Underground 102 reground, with no issues,
one Clark's or Underground 140 reground with no issues. One Clark's 304
reground in a 140 PG with no issues. I haven't tried any "new" profiles.
Are Clark's or Isky grinding this cams on new blanks or regrinding Chevy
cams. If you are grinding a new blank, you have a lot of latitude. If you
are regrinding a used cam you don't have much latitude at all. You pretty
much have to follow the original grind. When was the last cam blank for a
Corvair cam blank cast?
dp
-----Original Message-----
From: virtualvairs-bounces at corvair.org
[mailto:virtualvairs-bounces at corvair.org] On Behalf Of Ray Rodriguez III
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 8:03 PM
To: Virtual Vairs
Subject: <VV> Cams and noise: for the archives
I'm asking this question primarily for the sake of anyone searching the
archives in the future:
We have heard from a number of people that some Clarks cams (maybe only the
260) have been noisy.
I have heard a minimum of three reports of noisy Otto cams (possibly only
the Turbo "TB" series?) being very noisy
has anyone ever had a noise problem of this kind with an Isky cam?
This might be a little unfair but for now I'm gonna say I'll be a loyal Isky
customer from now on to play it safe. I'm glad I can buy Isky cams from
Clarks though, Cal earned my loyalty years ago. I try to support our other
vendors as well when I can.
Ray "Grymm" Rodriguez III
Lake Ariel, PA
66' Corsa 140 coupe
63' Monza PG (winter driver)
65' Corsa 140 coupe (under construction)
More information about the VirtualVairs
mailing list