<VV> 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt NOT Thunderbird (still no Corvair)

[ricknorris at suddenlink.net]

Well, thats the thing about Smitty. He always sugar coats his remarks. Now me on the other hand tries to be serious all the time...!
Seriously!
The Lone Haranguer



---- Wrsssatty at aol.com wrote: 
> Obviously, I can't speak for Smitty but I don't think he meant to type  
> "Thunderbird" but was addressing the thread regarding that 1941 Chrysler  
> Thunderbolt.  AND, IMHO, while he may have erred in typing "Thunderbird",  he 
> was, as they said back in the days when $100 used Corvairs were common,  "right 
> on" about that 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt being unattractive.  Forget  the 
> lightning bolt on the door, the whole car lacks proportion.  And that  color 
> is just plain hideous, especially against the other shade of green in the  
> upholstery!  YECCHHH!  Interesting--maybe; Beautiful?  Definitely  not!
>  
> <Smitty Says; The Thunderbird is a bloated lump with all the styling of  an 
> inverted claw foot bathtub. Even the lightning bolt on the door is  
> stylistically bland and lacks proportion. You guys been admiring the  
> emperor's new clothes too long.>
>  
> So why are we now dragging the Thunderbird into this off-topic discussion  
> over what seems apparently to have been a typo?!  Sheesh!
>  
> ~Bill Stanley
>  _______________________________________________
> This message was sent by the VirtualVairs mailing list, all copyrights are the property
> of the writer, please attribute properly. For help, mailto:vv-help at corvair.org
> This list sponsored by the Corvair Society of America, http://www.corvair.org/
> Post messages to: VirtualVairs at corvair.org
> Change your options: http://www.vv.corvair.org/mailman/options/virtualvairs 
>  _______________________________________________