<VV> 140/PG

[Karl Haakonsen]

Precisely.

I was attempting to reply out of context to Tim Colson's question about cam/crankshaft.

Karl in Boston (though actually in Miami today)
Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with SprintSpeed

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Monasterio <dmonasterio at hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 18:12:14 
To: <cityhawk at sprint.blackberry.net>; VirtualVairs<virtualvairs at corvair.org>
Subject: RE: <VV> 140/PG


Don't forget that the original setup for 140 / PG is the 889 camshaft with a retarded crankshaft. See the tech tips or Bob Helt's book.

Daniel Monasterio

> To: virtualvairs at corvair.org
> From: cityhawk at sprint.blackberry.net
> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 00:53:49 +0000
> Subject: <VV> 140/PG
> 
> I don't have the info in front of me, but my understanding was that using the 889 camshaft lowered the rpm where peak torque was reached, then retarding the camshaft moved the torque band back up a bit to optimize performance for the 140/PG combo. Could it be that the timing wasn't retarded on your setup?
> Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with SprintSpeed
>_______________________________________________
> This message was sent by the VirtualVairs mailing list, all copyrights are the property
> of the writer, please attribute properly. For help, mailto:vv-help at corvair.org
> This list sponsored by the Corvair Society of America, http://www.corvair.org/
> Post messages to: VirtualVairs at corvair.org
> Change your options: http://www.vv.corvair.org/mailman/options/virtualvairs 
>_______________________________________________