<VV> Fw: To post pictures ? Try again with tiny 16K pic

[Tony Underwood]

At 01:45 AM 9/4/2010, Charles Lee wrote:
>OK, the 67.6K pic got stripped (or delayed) so let's try a smaller one 16.6K
>this time ?
>
>Charlie
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Charles Lee" <Chaz at ProperProper.com>
>To: "J R Read" <hmlinc at sbcglobal.net>; "Eric Nelson" <a78coupe at yahoo.com>;
><virtualvairs at corvair.org>
>Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 10:39 PM
>Subject: Re: <VV> To post pictures ?
>
>
> > What are the limitations on pictures being attached on VV ?
> >




What is the exact reason that VV doesn't allow photos large enough to 
be usefully viewed?  Is it the problems with malignant attachments 
(viri, trojans, etc)?   These days it's pretty hard to get most stuff 
like this past many ISP's mail handlers...

Or, is it the size of the attached photos sitting on the server?   If 
this is the case, what about some extra drive space, like a terrabyte 
or two?   That should be enough to hold a few images... ;)  Anymore, 
a TB drive is available for less than 100 bucks easy.


A political list I frequent allows attached images up to a meg in 
size, no viri or trojan issues these days.   Then again that list 
sits on a private server that's thoroughly policed by the owner daily...



tony..