<VV> Counterfeit Car was "ebay 61 convert"

[Robby]

Then why doesn't someone report it - it is easy to sit here and tell
everyone that it should be reported.  If one of you feel it needs to be
reported, then do it!!

Robby

On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 9:35 AM, shortle <shortle556 at earthlink.net> wrote:

> Con man or idiot? In Colorado this vin tag would set in motion about 100
> red flags and this car would have to be retitled after a very thorough
> inspection (I'm sure the "hidden vin" would come into play).Probably a bond
> would be required of the owner/buyer if the numbers come back as clean.I
> agree with you Doc, this car should be reported to the e bay officials
> regarding the illegal aspects involved.
> Timothy Shortle in Durango Colorado
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> >From: RoboMan91324 at aol.com
> >Sent: May 2, 2010 9:05 PM
> >To: virtualvairs at corvair.org
> >Subject: <VV> Counterfeit Car was "ebay 61 convert"
> >
> >Folks,
> >
> >I have been following this train and I wonder if anyone has reported this
> >to eBay.  As Charles said, "some poor sucker will buy it."  This
> Frankenstein
> >car may not be able to be registered in some states.  If the person can't
> >register it and can't get his money back, he is screwed.  If the DMV does
> not
> >pick up on the screws, they will probably pick up on the number itself if
> >the computerized system goes back far enough.  Some do and some do not.
>  The
> >seller has a fictitious VIN plate and a BS story about 50 convertibles
> being
> >secretly made each year.  Even if he was innocently passing on a
> >counterfeit VIN plate poorly done by a PO, the BS story makes me think
> this guy is a
> >con man.
> >
> >Doc
> >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >In a message dated 5/2/2010 6:50:57 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> >virtualvairs-request at corvair.org writes:
> >
> >> Message: 4
> >> Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 19:44:09 -0500
> >> From: "Charles Fregeau" <n5hsr at sprynet.com>
> >> Subject: Re: <VV> ebay 61 convert
> >> To: "'Geoffrey Stozek'" <gjjs at att.net>, <VirtualVairs at corvair.org>
> >> Message-ID: <3E18566E77164EC497CCDA89462D41C8 at rosepacking.com>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain;   charset="US-ASCII"
> >>
> >> The tail lights are 62-style.  The info is wrong about Convertibles.
>  The
> >> VIN has been probably changed.  The paint is not original.  (Looks like
> >> someone used Adobe Beige house paint.)  There is no trim.  The front
> lights
> >> are 63-64.
> >>
> >> I'd laugh except some poor sucker will buy it.
> >>
> >> Charles Fregeau
> >> Ex 62 700 coupe.
> > _______________________________________________
> >This message was sent by the VirtualVairs mailing list, all copyrights are
> the property
> >of the writer, please attribute properly. For help, mailto:
> vv-help at corvair.org
> >This list sponsored by the Corvair Society of America,
> http://www.corvair.org/
> >Post messages to: VirtualVairs at corvair.org
> >Change your options:
> http://www.vv.corvair.org/mailman/options/virtualvairs
> > _______________________________________________
>
>  _______________________________________________
> This message was sent by the VirtualVairs mailing list, all copyrights are
> the property
> of the writer, please attribute properly. For help, mailto:
> vv-help at corvair.org
> This list sponsored by the Corvair Society of America,
> http://www.corvair.org/
> Post messages to: VirtualVairs at corvair.org
> Change your options:
> http://www.vv.corvair.org/mailman/options/virtualvairs
>  _______________________________________________
>