<VV> VirtualVairs Digest, Vol 60, Issue 102
djtcz at comcast.net
djtcz at comcast.net
Thu Jan 28 21:18:36 EST 2010
----- Original Message -----
From: Les < corvair at mts.net >
Subject: <VV> Engine building - more bearing clearances
OK, as a result of all the good advice, I gave up trying to measure
bearing bores with my crappy tools. I assembled and torqued the block
and crank first with .001 US then with .002 US, and settled on .002 US
as that gave me clearances of .0015-.0020 right across.
Now to the rod bearings. Plastigauging with STD bearings I see about
.002 clearance. Books say .001 best, .003 max. For a stock 140/4sp
street engine that likely won't see more than 3000 miles a year, do you
suppose it's worth $100 and a week out of my schedule ..................
Thanks,
Les
===============================================
First I'd use my telescope gauges and mike to measure each of the rod bores in 6 locations, practicing 100 times to get readings consistently within a half thou, The a bearing ID installed in a rod.
I'd use the "wring thru once " method with the telescope gauge lock lightly snug.
http://bbs.homeshopmachinist.net/archive/index.php/t-27178.html
Then for fun I'd "calibrate" that package of plastigage using 2 stout square steel bars with dressed faces, separated by feeler gauges and squeezed in a bench vise.
Only then would I decide whether to buy other bearings.
I would prefer a real 2 or 3 over 1 unless I KNEW the rod bores were gorgeously round and taper free. A little extra clearance is much more forgiving of housing/bearing distortion.
More information about the VirtualVairs
mailing list