<VV> Good Ref re strength of bolts
Chris & Bill Strickland
lechevrier at earthlink.net
Sat Feb 27 05:15:36 EST 2010
An interesting article by an apparently qualified engineer -- sometimes
it is a shame that qualified engineers can not see beyond the
mathematics of their profession -- yes, they have come a long ways since
"Galloping Gertie", but they still refuse to accept empirical evidence
that maybe their math on a particular fastener doesn't tell the whole
story. There is substantial empirical evidence, mostly from the world
of aircraft it seems, that some higher strength fasteners do not perform
as well under repeated cyclical flexing as fasteners of a lower grade.
Maybe they aren't adequately torqued, or the fastened material is too
soft to maintain that torque during the cycling, and the bolt only has
it's high strength when under high tension.
Anyway, if you discover that an application is breaking your highest
strength fasteners, you might consider your own empirical testing with a
fastener with a lower tensile strength. If your Grade 8's are working,
don't fix it! But remember to periodically inspect critical fasteners
for wear and corrosion
Godspeed!
Bill Strickland
More information about the VirtualVairs
mailing list