<VV> Fuel mileage and the cold
HallGrenn at aol.com
HallGrenn at aol.com
Sat Feb 20 10:58:23 EST 2010
In a message dated 2/20/2010 6:19:29 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
jvhroberts at aol.com writes:
Increased air density and viscosity at lower temperatures, as I already
mentioned.
John Roberts
-----Original Message-----
From: ScottyGrover at aol.com
To: VirtualVairs at corvair.org
Sent: Fri, Feb 19, 2010 10:05 pm
Subject: Re: <VV> Fuel mileage and the cold
Pardon my apparent stupidity, but what caused the difference in
aerodynamics?
Scotty from Hollyweird
In a message dated 2/19/2010 6:35:03 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
jvhroberts at aol.com writes:
My 2005 Subaru Legacy GT has an instantaneous as well as average gas
mileage feature. This has a turbo intercooled engine. On the same road
that I
drive a few times a week (flat, no turns, no intersections), in the
summer,
it's instantaneous MPG at 65 is 29. In winter, its instantaneous MPG is
25.
Worked through the air density and viscosity equations for aerodynamic
drag, and that accounted for ALL the difference. It really doesn't seem
to be
an engine issue, it's an aerodynamics issue.
And the snow on top.
Bob
More information about the VirtualVairs
mailing list