<VV> Replying to both sender AND VV ? Note to moderator ?

[Charles Lee]

Hmmm... I sent this at 1:49 PM and it didn't post until 6 PM ?????

Kind of unravels the thread !!!!!!!!!Charlie


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Charles Lee" <Chaz at ProperProper.com>
To: <virtualvairs at corvair.org>
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 1:49 PM
Subject: Re: <VV> Replying to both sender AND VV ? Note to moderator ?


> Matt,
>
> Another problem with this is that "Reply" only goes "To" the individual 
> sender, so in order to reply to VV only, "Reply to all" must be used, and 
> then the individual addresses must be deleted from the "To" address box.
>
> I'm using Outlook.
>
> This may be why it is not done as often as intended (plus my inapplicable 
> reasoning) ?
>
> Maybe VV's mail server could make VV the primary, so "Reply" uses that as 
> the primary return address, and the individual who initiated the email 
> would be used only with "Reply to all" ?
>
> Just a suggestion -
>
> Charlie
>
>  ----- Original Message ----- 
>  From: Matt Nall
>  To: Chaz at ProperProper.com
>  Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 12:25 PM
>  Subject: Re: <VV> Replying to both sender AND VV ?
>
>
>  Sorry Charlie... no excuses... it's Spam... unwanted by most...
>
>
>
>
>    proper   thing is to reply to VV......  then Forward the VV message to 
> the ONE person...
>
>
>  Matt Nall
>  Charleston, Oregon
>  http://mysite.ncnetwork.net/reswr0kp/
>
>
>
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: Charles Lee <Chaz at ProperProper.com>
>  To: Matt Nall <patiomatt at aol.com>
>  Sent: Fri, Aug 20, 2010 10:18 am
>  Subject: Re: <VV> Replying to both sender AND VV ?
>
>
>  Yes, mostly correct, and not wrong ;>})
>
>  If an email is of general value to members, and specifically sent to the 
> one who asked a question, it could land in two folders on the recipient's 
> computer :
>
>  If email is sorted and grouped, one "VV" copy is among all the other 
> messages and needs to be "dug out" while the other goes to a specific 
> email filed, or just the "Inbox" where it is more easily found (unless 
> your "Inbox" is just as cluttered ?)
>
>   Charlie
>    ----- Original Message ----- 
>    From: Matt Nall
>    To: Chaz at ProperProper.com
>    Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 5:17 PM
>    Subject: Re: <VV> Make the "subject" line relevant & redundant 
> responses
>
>
>
>
>      I often rely to "All" since the sender may want a response before 
> they check their VV mail, but maybe this is redundant overkill ?
>      ==========================================
>    charlie... email is emaill...all comes in  at the same time usually...
>
>
>     I got both of these at the same time...even though VV had to process 
> their copy.
>
>
>    Matt
> _______________________________________________
> This message was sent by the VirtualVairs mailing list, all copyrights are 
> the property
> of the writer, please attribute properly. For help, 
> mailto:vv-help at corvair.org
> This list sponsored by the Corvair Society of America, 
> http://www.corvair.org/
> Post messages to: VirtualVairs at corvair.org
> Change your options: 
> http://www.vv.corvair.org/mailman/options/virtualvairs
> _______________________________________________
>