<VV> VV Autocross Article
Sethracer at aol.com
Sethracer at aol.com
Mon Aug 9 02:41:27 EDT 2010
In a message dated 8/8/2010 3:27:22 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
bub049 at comcast.net writes:
It appears to me that Ron did what he was supposed to do. As someone
stated here it is up to the driver to say what his/her car has for
modifications, if any. Ron did that. He said he had a big bore engine. And, yes, his
'62 Monza is stock except for the engine. I know the car well. He said it was
his first autocross. The person doing the classifying should have properly
placed the vehicle. I can't see where the problem should become Ron's,
especially if he is new to autocrossing and doesn't know the classes. He told
the official that his car had a big bore engine. He came out to have fun
and see what his new motor would do.
Bob - According to Ron, that is not exactly how it happened. Ron said he
had a "Big" motor. If you say that to a Corvair person, and you are driving a
stock-looking 1962 car, what would you think that means? To me, that would
indicate a 164" motor, instead of a 145" motor. The person working tech
then asked if it had 4-carbs or 2-carbs. Ron told him 4 carbs, and the guy
suggested SS-4. That is where a stock late model with a stock 140 would be.
That was a mistake - it was bad advice. A 140 equipped early would be in an
Improved Stock class. With the 3.1, the car would move to SM-3. Nobody
accused Ron of doing anything underhanded, just a rookie mistake. We have all
done that.
However - Only one person does the classification at a Corsa autocross.
The competitor. They fill out the form, and, if needed, place the
classification on the car window. They can ask for advice - and many do - but it is
advice. The only time that a car will be "classified" - or rather
"re-classified" is if the initial competitor's classification is protested by another
competitor in that class, and the competitor refuses to properly classify
his/her car. At that point, the Corsa Competition Chairman, or his
representative, could re-classify the car. It behooves the competitor to "Read the
rulebook". I assure you, there are lots of competitor who read every word.
We realize that this self-classification puts a burden on the competitor.
Unlike the Concours, we cannot point out all of the modifications that
would change the class of a car. Many modifications are internal, or not
identifiable by easy visual means. That is why the burden is on the competitor.
In many ways we put more trust in the competitor than the Concours folks do.
Over the years, I have given classification advice to hundreds of
competitors. But it was advice. As the representative of the Competition Committee
Chairman, I have, on several occasions, requested competitors to correct
their classifications, based on protests. Usually, however, when the "error"
is pointed out, the competitor corrects the "mistake". When I am competing
in a class where certain things are allowed, and others are not allowed, I
always scope out the other cars in the class, and I am not shy about
pointing out any discrepancies, or, at least asking about them!
And as far as the reader pointing out the 3.1 motor in the admittedly
great article? Well, I think Ron's skin was a little thin here on VV. The reader
was asking the question, not accusing anybody of underhandedness. As I
mentioned, Ron's only mistake was a common one for first-time competitors.
"Mis-classification happens"
Just as an aside, Rod Bradley, the local autocross chair in Cedar Rapids,
and I offered an early tech inspection option for several hours in the
afternoon before the event, right at the hotel. We did help several competitors
get a leg up on the day at Hawkeye Downs. We had copies of the rules
available, (as did every competitor in their Convention packet) and answered
questions for others.
A final note. The results, as printed, stand. As someone else pointed out,
the limit on protests is long past. Nobody will be shipping any trophies
around, at least not at my request.
Seth Emerson
Corsa Autocross Chairman
More information about the VirtualVairs
mailing list