<VV> Radial Engine, not Rotary
Jim Houston
jhouston001 at cfl.rr.com
Fri Apr 16 09:15:46 EDT 2010
Doc: ROTARY airplane engines have a fixed crank and the cylinders
rotate. RADIAL engines have a fixed crankcase and cylinders and the
crankshaft rotates (same as regular engines). Do a Google search on
LeRhone Rotary and Pratt & Whitney Radial engines for more details..
What you wrote is correct for ROTARY engines, by the way... and, yes,
they slung oil - a lot! Since they used Castor oil, the pilots back
then never had a problem with constipation!!
Jim Houston
On 4/16/2010 4:13 AM, RoboMan91324 at aol.com wrote:
> Scotty,
>
> That was a radial engine and yes, it seems an odd way to get rotation to
> the propeller. I am not sure what benefit there was to holding the crank
> stationary and spinning the rest of the motor. I don't know if the engine
> slung oil but spinning the massive radial engine created a huge gyroscopic
> effect. For those of you who are familiar with this effect, it would cause
> the airplane to nosedive when trying to turn left (or right depending on the
> rotation) and go nose up when turning in the other direction. Of course,
> it would try to go right or left when trying to go up or down. These
> planes having a mind of their own took a lot of getting used to and many
> trainees lost their lives before they learned the counterintuitive techniques to
> get the plane going in the direction they wanted. As you might imagine,
> this was especially a problem on takeoff and landing when adjustments had to
> be made due to cross wind, etc. It took lots and lots of practice to have
> full control during radical maneuvers such as in a dogfight. If you know
> anyone who still flies one of these antique planes, just ask about this
> phenomenon.
>
> Doc
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> In a message dated 4/15/2010 7:29:08 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
> virtualvairs-request at corvair.org writes:
>
> From: lclarkpdx at gmail.com
> CC: virtualvairs at corvair.org
> Sent: 4/15/2010 11:05:06 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time
> Subj: Re:<VV> Yet another Corvair slam
>
>
> The author has also confused a radial engine with a rotary engine in the
> part about the RX2, and claims that rotaries were old technology in the
> 1920's. I thought the wankel was invented in the 50's.
>
> Rotary engines were common for aeromotive use in WW1; the most common was
> the Gnome-Rhone. It held the crankshaft stationary and the cylinder
> assembly (air-cooled, of course) rotated to spin the propellor (what an
> oil-slinger!)
>
> Scotty from Hollyweird
> _______________________________________________
> This message was sent by the VirtualVairs mailing list, all copyrights are the property
> of the writer, please attribute properly. For help, mailto:vv-help at corvair.org
> This list sponsored by the Corvair Society of America, http://www.corvair.org/
> Post messages to: VirtualVairs at corvair.org
> Change your options: http://www.vv.corvair.org/mailman/options/virtualvairs
> _______________________________________________
>
>
More information about the VirtualVairs
mailing list