<VV> Gearing (was: Corvair vs. Falcon)
FrankCB
frankcb at aol.com
Sat Jan 3 17:14:47 EST 2009
For many years GM was ONE gear behind the US competition regarding number of gears in it's automatic transmissions. In 1961 I bought a 58 Plymouth with 3 speed Torqueflite instead of the 2 speed PG Chevrolet. When GM cars finally got 3 speed automatics the competition was selling 4 speed automatics. Our 89 Chevy Beretta automatic still had only 3 speeds (but that was my wife's choice). Now some of the competition is up to 6 and even 7 gears which might be a bit of overkill.
The big advantage of extra gears in automatics is the possibility of very tall overall gearing enabling you to drive (and even accelerate) at highway speeds below 2000 rpm which the sophisticated sequential EFI systems can handle. So you can get much better mileage with larger engines and heavier cars than our Corvairs can generally do.
Frank "likes tall gearing" Burkhard
airvair at earthlink.net writes:
Some of the other marketing blunders I think GM's marketers and design
engineers committed (and this is with the full realization that hindsight
is 20/20) were the late adaptation of three-speed automatics, larger
wheels, and disc brakes. When you consider that, it's sometimes almost
amazing that GM held as much of the market against F**d and Cryco as they
did. Certainly the Corvair would have benefitted greatly had those items
(at least the first two) been on late models, even as options.
-Mark
More information about the VirtualVairs
mailing list