<VV> Bob's (typically different) viewpoint on 100%

[aeroned at aol.com]

Sly as a fox....very Jersey. (I'm saying that as a compliment)

Ned



-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Marlow <Vairtec at optonline.net>
To: AeroNed at aol.com; virtualvairs at corvair.org
Sent: Wed, Dec 16, 2009 10:16 pm
Subject: Re: <VV> Bob's (typically different) viewpoint on 100%


At 11:09 PM 12/16/2009, AeroNed at aol.com wrote: 
 
>Have you been to Kansas? There's literally hundred of miles between 
>chapters. It is 500 miles from Wichita to Denver. According to your >plan, the 
>person living 250 miles away from the nearest local chapter must pay dues to 
>that chapter. 
 
No they mustn't. They must pay dues to the chapter of their choosing. 
 
> Is this an argument for or against the 100% CORSA requirement? 
 
Ahh, you're catching on. My premise is essentially "against" the 100% CORSA requirement. Note this from my very first post: 
 
"I think the whole 100% membership debate is relatively unimportant. I think that CORSA's membership numbers will continue to fall, 
ultimately settling at some point of stabilization, regardless of the national-local membership policy. 
 
"If you want to feel more comfortable about the current arrangement, don't think of the local clubs as being "chapters" in the strictest 
sense. Think of them as being "affiliates." CORSA is fortunate to have them." 
 
--Bob