<VV> adjusting valves - I want to believe!
Bryan Blackwell
bryan at skiblack.com
Tue Nov 11 15:21:36 EST 2008
Hi folks,
I finally had time to read Craig's excellent analysis. It had
occurred to me as well that part of the 1/4 turn vs. 1 turn
adjustment could be whether the valves were adjusted hot and running
or not (this doesn't include performance engines where we are trying
to avoid pump up). I'll add a data point. You may recall I just
completed a piston and barrel swap on the basement 110 that went into
the '66. On that engine I adjusted the valves cold and tightened
them to 1/2 turn. As suggested by Craig's numbers, the engine runs
fine, but in fact one valve always has a little "tick" to it. I have
to do a couple other things to it, so I'll adjust the valves to 3/4
turn and see how that works. One thing not calculated previously is
that although the engine grows, so do the valves, which may explain
why the calculated valve adjustment doesn't quite match what we see
in practice.
--Bryan
On Nov 3, 2008, at 12:23 AM, Craig Nicol wrote:
> So the questions are: Why does 1/4 turn seem to work so well?
>
> If the preload is set to 1/4 turn when cold, according to this
> analysis it
> should clatter when hot. Perhaps 1/4 turn works only if adjusted at
> operating temperature. I wonder if this unspoken need to have the
> engine at
> temperature is why we hear so much cold/hot, 1/4 turn-1/2 turn-1-turn
> controversy? Maybe 1-turn is the right answer if valves are
> adjusted cold
> and 1/2-1/4 turn is the answer if adjusted hot.
> Craig Nicol
More information about the VirtualVairs
mailing list