<VV> Re: VirtualVairs Digest, Vol 32, Issue 76
Dale Dewald
dkdewald at pasty.net
Fri Sep 21 10:40:10 EDT 2007
At 13:39 9/20/07 -0400, Bill S wrote:
>>previous question<<
> >I'm wondering where I got the idea that early and late FC suspension was
> different. Any clues?
> >
>The later FC crossmember possibly doesn't have holes to mount the
>shifter parts down there for the early FC's, and since I'm not too
>familiar with the through the tank late shifter, maybe there is
>something for that that is different ...
The mid '63 to '65 FC crossmember does not have the holes and weld nuts for
the shifter. Instead, it has a "dent" (for lack of a better term) in the
upper section to provide clearance for the shifter tube. I tried to use an
early '63 crossmember when I rebuilt the front suspension in our '65
Greenbrier and discovered this minor but significant difference. I assume
that the crossmembers would be interchangeable for PG equipped vehicles.
Dale Dewald
Hancock, MI
More information about the VirtualVairs
mailing list