<VV> What's The Difference
BobHelt at aol.com
BobHelt at aol.com
Wed Jul 11 19:27:22 EDT 2007
In a message dated 7/11/2007 3:30:06 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
hmlinc at sbcglobal.net writes:
Hi Bob, Don't know if this impacts, but the '60 cylinder bore (stock) was
3.375" while the '61 - '63 bore was 3.4375". So, besides head and carb
differences - the bore could also play a role in the advertised HP?
Hi JR,
His question concerned only the differences between the 98 and 102 HP
engines, not the 95 engine, a strictly 1960 engine!
So that means any bore size differences from 1960 to 61 are irrelevant. The
98 engine was strictly a 1961 engine while the 102 was 1962-63. No 1960
engines were included in his question.
Regards,
Bob Helt
************************************** Get a sneak peak of the all-new AOL at
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
More information about the VirtualVairs
mailing list