<VV> VV Muffler project for a cheapskate
Frank DuVal
corvairduval at cox.net
Sun Jan 7 23:29:00 EST 2007
Airflow is not always a logical straightforward line of flow. This is
why wind tunnels are used to study the way an object affects airflow.
The back of Corvairs used to be black in the days before Viton o-rings
as most of them leaked oil. The oil was sucked back onto the rear panel.
Same with station wagons, they suck exhaust in the rear window
(backlight), or even non-Corvair sedans if the trunk is not closed. An
early has vents in the engine lid very close to the break point of the
lid to rear panel line. So it IS possible to suck exhaust in under the
right air flow conditions. Since the turbo models have the exhaust in
the rear, even on earlies, I would not be concerned if John's exhaust
was similar.
Remember how planes fly. The path over the wing is not the same as under
the wing, therefore lift due to pressure differential. Car bodies have
similar airflow disruptions and can have pressure differentials. Wind
tunnel testing could be the answer. Anyone have access to a car sized one?
Just goes to show one must not operate a Corvair with the rear lights
missing! :-)
Frank DuVal
AeroNed at aol.com wrote:
>
>In a message dated 1/7/2007 11:55:35 A.M. Central Standard Time,
>hmlinc at sbcglobal.net writes:
>
>Further,
>that straight out the back exhaust (at least a portion) can be sucked
>forward and into the engine compartment - and hence into the heater system.
>
>
>Huh!?!
>
>How does the exhaust get sucked forward? If the car is moving forward there
>will be sufficient airflow over the deck lid to prevent any exhaust from
>flowing forward. If the car is still, the chance of exhaust flowing forward is the
>same if the exit is in the rear or the side. Now if the car is going
>backward, now you might be able to get some exhaust into the inlet.
>
>Ned
>
>
>
More information about the VirtualVairs
mailing list