<VV> Econo and TSD
Bruce Schug
bwschug at charter.net
Mon Aug 13 11:22:53 EDT 2007
On Aug 13, 2007, at 10:23 AM, Brian wrote:
> I was at Ashville but only particpated in the rally in a BMW so now
> Econo Run. What exactly happened that causes us to forever refuse to
> re-look the rules?
>
As I recall, the Rally had three legs. We started out and ran a couple
of legs ending up at a gas station. Here, we filled our tanks and
finished the Rally and at the same time, ran the Economy Run. I suppose
those who were not running the Economy Run simply didn't fill up or at
least weren't checked in when they arrived at the finish of both
events, which of course was at a gas station.
The problem was, we were of course still using rally instructions.
Shortly after beginning the last leg of the Rally (which was the
Economy Run) there was, what my navigator, myself, and several others
felt was a bad instruction. It involved the SAP rule. The road curved
to the left and also went straight ahead. Following the SAP rule, we
went straight ahead. Shortly thereafter, we realized we were lost;
nothing was making any sense. This was the first problem we had
encountered on the route.
We found our way back to the gas station, where vehicles were still
leaving from and asked if we could re-start the Economy Run, thinking
we had already ruined our chances at the Rally. Let me add that my
navigator was a Chemical Engineer and was quite good with math. We made
a very good rally team. We would go down the road and continually
update ourselves as to where we should be when. We were experienced and
thought we had a good chance to do well on the Rally. At the same time,
I was fully prepared for the Economy Run and always did quite well at
that event. I was competing for the Cole Award.
The officials would not allow us to re-start the Economy Run. So, we
took off, along the same route again. We carefully watched each
instruction and, again, found ourselves lost. At the time, I don't
think we knew where we had gotten lost. Not knowing what else to do, we
looked ahead on the instructions and figured out where the event(s)
ended. We went to the gas station where we were checked in for the
Rally and gassed up to finish the Economy Run.
At the awards banquet I found I had scored 92.xx points in the Concours
and won my class (the old IS-3) at the Autocross. But the surprise came
when we found we had won the Rally! Of course, we weren't mentioned in
the Economy Run results. Later, I found out we had gotten about 12 mpg.
I thought I might still finish well for the Cole, but as the names were
read mine wasn't mentioned until next-to-the last; I had finished
second by a very small margin.
We talked to several other competitors who also got lost on that last
leg; it wasn't just us. There were several of us pretty unhappy that
the events had been done this way. What we felt was a bad rally
instruction ruined the Economy Run for several of us.
Now, you could say that all this was due to an error in the
Rally/Economy Run instructions - it was a design error, not a rules
error. But the fact is rallies need to be run by rally instructions.
Economy runs need to be run by economy run instructions, which may even
include a map or other aides.
Of course, these events could be run simultaneously, but why? The
Economy Run is not a subset or a part of a rally. A rally is not an
extension of an Economy Run. They are two distinct events deserving
their own rules, instructions and time periods. Besides, there are so
many things going on at a convention, having the four major events on
four separate days spreads things out better and allows more time to
participate in other activities.
Next year's convention sounds like it is being scheduled well. Two days
for travel before and after the convention and five full days for the
convention itself.
Bruce
Bruce W. Schug
President, CORSA South Carolina
Greenville, SC
bwschug at charter.net
CORSA member since 1980
'67 Monza. "67AC140"
More information about the VirtualVairs
mailing list