<VV> Tire Rotation?
Andy Clark
slowboat at mindspring.com
Tue Sep 19 14:00:15 EDT 2006
Thanks, Bill. That's what happens when you rely on old habits (which are SO
hard to change!) <G>.
Although I must admit there's still a seed of suspicion in the back of my
mind that a tire company is not impartial, or motivated to help increase
tire life.
Andy (suspicious by nature) Clark
1966 140/4 Monza Sedan
1966 140/4 Yenko Clone
1966 180/4 Cord 8/10 #60
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Elliott" <corvair at fnader.com>
To: "Andy Clark" <slowboat at mindspring.com>
Cc: <virtualvairs at corvair.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: <VV> Tire Rotation?
> Actually, modern radials don't have that problem and cross rotation is
> now recommended . See
>
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tiretech/techpage.jsp?techid=43¤tpage=38
>
> Bill
>
> Andy Clark wrote:
>
> >Correct- front to back (or back to front- have it your way <G>).
> >Radial tires are rotation sensitive after they have been broken in.
> >Andy Clark
> >1966 140/4 Monza Sedan
> >1966 140/4 Yenko Clone
> >1966 180/4 Cord 8/10 #60
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: <Corvkid50 at aol.com>
> >Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 10:09 AM
> >Subject: Re: <VV> Tire Rotation?
> >
> >>I thought with radials you went back to front on the same side. No X
> >>
> >pattern.
> >
> >>Ron T
More information about the VirtualVairs
mailing list