<VV> GM Car of the Future (No Corvair)

[airvair]

But to me, THAT is the best description of a "classic" design. Simply
put, it ages well, keeping a "modern" look for many years, even decades.

The lates have aged well, while the earlies have simply aged. While that
may not be a bad thing, it simply means that earlies look their age,
while lates don't.

-Mark

Charles Lee at Proper Pro Per wrote:
> 
> Earlies certainly are nice, but their design is more "classic" in style.
> 
> However, EMs looked old ("classic") when the were new.
> 
> LMs still look new, even those they're old.
> 
> 40 years later, LMs still have a design that would sell, in my somewhat
> biased opinion.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Shaun" <shaun_mcgarvey at shaw.ca>
> Cc: "Virtual Vairs" <VirtualVairs at corvair.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 5:33 PM
> Subject: Re: <VV> GM Car of the Future (No Corvair)
> 
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Charles Lee at Proper Pro Per"
> >> The LM coupe is one of the prettiest cars ever built (and won
> > International
> >> awards in 1967 to reflect that we are not the only ones to think so
> >
> > I agree, and '64s look even better!
> >
> > yea, Vairily ... Shaun
> >