<VV> multigrade oils..
Bill Elliott
corvair at fnader.com
Mon Oct 2 21:24:58 EDT 2006
I'm having difficulty reading your coded emails. ;-)
Are you trying to say that a 5W-50 will be burned at a higher rate than
a straight 50 weight? Or that the cold viscosity changes with age more
quickly than the hot viscosity? Or that an engine will burn or leak a 20
weight oil more quickly than it will a 50 weight?
I can agree with just one of those.
Bill
TimogensTurbo at aol.com wrote:
>In a message dated 10/2/2006 3:28:31 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
>corvair at fnader.com writes:
>
>
>
>>Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying... a 0W-50 should be exactly the
>>same as a straight 50 weight when hot...
>>
>>
>>
>===================================================
>
>May or may not be........BUT the "0"-xxx will go away WAY faster...
>then 50 wt.
>
>I've had soooo many "worn" engines ... that a weight change let's them run
>smokless for another 100,000..
>
>2 Vairs I've had used 60wt in SoCal.....no oil added in 20,000 miles of
>commuting...but were smokers, oil eaters before I got them!
>
>
>
>
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.407 / Virus Database: 268.12.11/460 - Release Date: 10/1/2006
More information about the VirtualVairs
mailing list