<VV> Marketing vs. Engineering
Borrrris at aol.com
Borrrris at aol.com
Wed Nov 1 21:00:40 EST 2006
The discussion here about moving the battery up front for f/r balance
improvement got me thinking once again that Chevy coulda/ probably shoulda done it
that way all along. Same deal with the spare IMO.
So I wonder, what other no cost/low cost engineering decisions could
Chevy have made if their perception at the time was that the market demanded
better balance over more trunk space? And how close to ideal do you think they
could have come (at about the same cost) if that had been their top priority?
I've noticed that, counting me, there seem to be at least 3 Matts here,
so I'll start signing my posts....
Matt from L.I.
('66 Monza coupe 110/PG)
More information about the VirtualVairs
mailing list