<VV> Ride Height -- FC's

[James Dallas]

Dale,  I put Ken's setup under my Rampside and used the shocks he sells all the way around.  I am quite happy with this setup.

Jim Dallas
MCCA
GNRT
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Dale Dewald<mailto:dkdewald at pasty.net> 
  To: virtualvairs at corvair.org<mailto:virtualvairs at corvair.org> 
  Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 9:47 PM
  Subject: Re: <VV> Ride Height -- FC's


  At 04:38 AM 5/1/06 -0400, Kelly Parker wrote:

  >   Since some of you are discussing ride height on your cars, I thought  I'd
  >ask. My 62 Greenbrier sits a bit high up front. I'd like to lower it by
  >cutting a coil off each spring. My question is, do I cut them at the top 
  >or  bottom

  I think I would be inclined to cut a coil off the top.  Be aware, however, 
  that this will stiffen the spring considerably and the stock front springs 
  on FC's seem to be rather stiff already.  Another way to lower the front 
  ride height is to order a set of modified springs (V8 Mustang) from Ken 
  Hand (Handy Car Care; 248-613-8586).  These have a lower spring rate and 
  ride 1" to 1-1/2" lower than stock.

  >  and are the stock shocks an acceptable application? If not, what 
  > shocks  are
  >recommended?

  I think that the stock shocks do not have enough damping to control the 
  front end motion on FC's, but this is not the whole story. At stock height 
  the FC front suspension rides near the top of its travel.  There is plenty 
  of jounce (compression travel) but not much rebound (extension 
  travel).  Hitting a large bump rarely (if ever) causes the front end to 
  bottom out but the rebound stops are regularly contacted when a tire drops 
  into the shallowest pothole. Obviously this situation does not create the 
  best ride, nor is it helped by the pendulum effect of the large of front 
  overhang.  Reducing the ride height will likely improve ride quality more 
  than the increased stiffness from cutting coils would degrade ride quality. 
  In such case the stock shocks would probably be okay with shortened 
  (stiffer) stock springs.

  Ken includes a pair of heavy duty gas shocks with his spring kit to 
  counteract the front "bobbing" effect.  I have gone a step further, and 
  with some research found that Bilstein # B46-0925 shocks (application for 
  '71-'00 Dodge B100, B200 vans) can be fitted front and rear with slight 
  modification to the shock mounts and rear control arms.  I have the 
  Bilstein's, Ken's front springs and Clark's '61-62 GB repro rear springs on 
  our '65 Greenbrier and have been very happy with the combination.

  Dale Dewald
  Hancock, MI


  -- 
  Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
  Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
  Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.6 - Release Date: 2/10/06


   _______________________________________________
  This message was sent by the VirtualVairs mailing list, all copyrights are the property
  of the writer, please attribute properly. For help, mailto:vv-help at corvair.org<mailto:vv-help at corvair.org>
  This list sponsored by the Corvair Society of America, http://www.corvair.org/<http://www.corvair.org/>
  Post messages to: VirtualVairs at corvair.org<mailto:VirtualVairs at corvair.org>
  Change your options: http://www.vv.corvair.org/mailman/options/virtualvairs<http://www.vv.corvair.org/mailman/options/virtualvairs> 
   _______________________________________________