<VV> Re: [SCG] 1964 Spyder questions

[Shaun]

Thank you Richard, Stan and Kent
I'm still looking for the original block, but the original number was
T0127YR.
yea, Vairily ... Shaun

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard W Thompson" <Richard.W.Thompson at usa.dupont.com>
To: "Shaun <shaun_mcgarvey" <shaun_mcgarvey at shaw.ca>
Cc: <scg-list at tiger.skiblack.com>; <scg-list-bounces at tiger.skiblack.com>;
"Virtual Vairs" <virtualvairs at corvair.org>; "Bill Hubbell"
<whubbell at umich.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 8:18 PM
Subject: Re: [SCG] 1964 Spyder questions


>
>
>
>
> Hi Shaun,
>
> On the coil, no, they used the coil for '64 for all Vairs.
>
> On the wires, there are codes on Packard wires that are dated by quarter
of
> the year. Reproduction Packard wires come that way as well. What you are
> reading states that the wires were made in the 4th quarter of 1963. BUT,
it
> doesn't always follow that the date of wire manufacture will be close to
> the build date of the engine. There are exceptions and are more to the
> human side of things than anything else. There were wires that were made a
> quarter earlier that could be on a later engine (these are shipping and/or
> factory line use anomolies that came up regularly).
>
> What is the date on your engine block?
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Rich
>
>
>
>
>              Shaun
>              <shaun_mcgarvey at s
>              haw.ca>                                                    To
>              Sent by:                  Richard W
>              scg-list-bounces@         Thompson/AE/DuPont at DuPont, Bill
>              tiger.skiblack.co         Hubbell <whubbell at umich.edu>
>              m                                                          cc
>                                        Virtual Vairs
>                                        <virtualvairs at corvair.org>,
>              01/17/2006 10:45          scg-list at tiger.skiblack.com,
>              PM                        scg-list-bounces at tiger.skiblack.com
>                                                                    Subject
>                                        Re: [SCG]  1964 Spyder questions
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 1) Did turbo cars have a different (hotter) coil?
>
> 2) I've got a set of original plug wires off of a low-mile CDN '64. It's a
> full set including the coil wire and they're all date coded 4-Q-63.
Usually
> with other ancillaries, the letter corresponds to the month of production,
> minus I  , so M should be the 12th month. What does that make Q?
>
> yea, Vairily ... Shaun
>
> This message was sent by the SCG-list mailing list, all copyrights are the
> property
> of the writer, please attribute properly. For help,
> mailto:scg-list-help at corvair.org
> This list sponsored by the Corvair Society of America,
> http://www.corvair.org/
> Post messages to: SCG-list at tiger.skiblack.com
> Change your options: http://www.vv.corvair.org/mailman/options/scg-list
> Get further information about SCG at
>
http://members.cox.net/whubbell/Stock%20Corvair%20Group/Hello%20to%20all%20new%20and%20prior%20members.htm
>
>
> This communication is for use by the intended recipient and contains
> information that may be Privileged, confidential or copyrighted under
> applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> formally notified that any use, copying or distribution of this e-mail,
> in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender by
> return e-mail and delete this e-mail from your system. Unless explicitly
> and conspicuously designated as "E-Contract Intended", this e-mail does
> not constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment, or an acceptance
> of a contract offer. This e-mail does not constitute a consent to the
> use of sender's contact information for direct marketing purposes or for
> transfers of data to third parties.
>
> Francais Deutsch Italiano  Espanol  Portugues  Japanese  Chinese  Korean
>
>            http://www.DuPont.com/corp/email_disclaimer.html