Fwd: <VV> Jacking
HallGrenn at aol.com
HallGrenn at aol.com
Sun Aug 27 18:13:40 EDT 2006
In a message dated 8/27/2006 1:55:32 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
hyarnell1 at earthlink.net writes:
I have always put a roll jack under the differential, but have been severely
chaistized that I'm ruining the motor/trans mounts. Can't see why. You'd be
putting the mounts (all three) in compression. They already are in
compression with the car just sitting there. Can someone explain to me why
this is wrong?
Harry Yarnell
Harry, One of the main reasons I have not jacked my cars using the drive
train as the jacking point is that you are lifting something that is much
heavier (the car) than the drive train the three mounts are supposed to
support--in the opposite direction from which they are supposed to work. On a fairly
new car or with new remanufactured mounts you may get away with it for awhile,
but eventually the reverse shear will be detrimental.
P.S. In an earlier post I recommended using the skid plate to support the
engine when changing a rear mount or the harmonic balancer. I anyone took my
message to mean jacking the engine/car with the skid plate please don't. You
can support the engine by the skid plate when you want to take off the rear
mount, but don't jack the rear with it--good engine mounts are getting more
and more expensive.
Bob Hall
Group Corvair
'64 Brier
'65 Corsa
2 '68 Monzas
More information about the VirtualVairs
mailing list