<VV> Re: PG RAMPY POWER QUEST 110hp/140hp torque the same
BobHelt at aol.com
BobHelt at aol.com
Tue Aug 22 11:23:27 EDT 2006
Hi Dan,
Thanks for writing. Please see below for comments.
Regards,
Bob helt
In a message dated 8/22/2006 5:43:07 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
dsjkling at sbcglobal.net writes:
Actually, you're right about that now that I think about it a little
more....but still, isn't the net effect of the 95HP cam coupled with the 4
degree retard crankgear an attempt to broaden the torque curve and lower it
compared to the standard 140HP?
Well yes, that was the purpose. Chev only had three LM cams available to
them. The 304 was out for several reasons. So that left the 95 and 110 cams. The
110 cam was a "hi speed' cam and thus lacked the low speed push that the Pg
needed (stall is 1600 rpm). They tried that with the very early 140-PG setups.
It didn't work well. So the choice was forced to the 95 cam. But while this
had the low end, the top end was lacking. Solution was to shift the TQ up the
rpm range by the 4 deg retard (about 400 rpm).
The max torque for the 140HP and the 110HP
is still the same, just at different RPMs, increasing RPMs increases HP not
Torque.
Well, that begs the question. First you are stating ADVERTISED TQ and HP
specs that have no relationship to reality. You need to look at the Chev
published NET TQ and HP specs. Then you need to see on the curves that the 95 TQ
shines up to 1600 rpm over the other two. But over 1600 rpm the 110 takes the
honors for TQ up to about 2300 rpm. After that it's no contest. The 140 walks
away from the other two engines in the TQ department.
There are only three ways I know of to increase torque:
1) Increase displacement
2) Nitrous
3) Turbo/supercharging
All of which mean pumping more air/fuel at a given rpm.
What about just increasing the compression ratio? That increases the TQ
too.............. And you forgot improvements to airflow and combustion chamber
design, plus a few more like chamber heat flows, and port tuning, etc.
Regards,
Bob Helt
More information about the VirtualVairs
mailing list