<VV> "3 More Years of Corvair"
Mark Murphy
m.j.murphy at comcast.net
Thu Aug 17 23:10:44 EDT 2006
Five-year depreciation/amortization of the tooling. Has to be in use to
be depreciated.
Jeff Clark wrote:
> The cost of losing those lawsuits (and the resultant
> bad publicity) would have been far more than the money
> GM was losing by continuing Corvair production,
> so........... The only logical conclusion as to why
> GM continued to build it well past any "point of least
> return" is to withold that
> "see-we-TOLD-you-it-was-unsafe!" claim from the
> plaintiffs. I just can't come up with any better
> reason than that- can you?
More information about the VirtualVairs
mailing list