<VV> New Garage - Lighting
JVHRoberts at aol.com
JVHRoberts at aol.com
Sun Oct 23 19:40:54 EDT 2005
In this case, with a CRI of 86, you'd be hard pressed to appreciate the
difference, much less justify the cost.
In a message dated 10/23/2005 5:29:59 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
jb30343 at navix.net writes:
The Philips tubes you're using are good. So is the price. Still,
incandescent, with a CRI of 100 are tough to beat for paint touch up and
similar activities. Human eyes are great at compensating for less than
ideal lighting. A very small amount of incandescent light makes a big
difference in CRI. --J.B.
> JVHRoberts at aol.com wrote:
>
> Save the aggravation. I have 86+ CRI, 3500K T8 fluorescents with
> electronic ballasts, and I have ZERO doubt that incandescents NOT be
> an improvement. These fluorescents are GREAT! No flicker, starts when
> it's very cold, and have excellent color rendition. And, all the time,
> using less energy than standard shop lights, and FAR less than
> incandescents.
> Got my fixtures at Home Depot, and got my tubes online, a case of 25,
> for under $3 a tube. Mine were the Philips ALTO, F32T8/835PLUS. GE,
> Sylvania, and others make similar tubes. You want the high CRI
> variety, they show colors a lot better, and are a bit more efficient.
More information about the VirtualVairs
mailing list