<VV> Re: <> Re: re; egr's
JVHRoberts at aol.com
JVHRoberts at aol.com
Thu Jun 23 07:54:21 EDT 2005
Given the nature of these systems, and the fact that Corvair engines weren't
inherently designed to be 'smog motors', adding EGR is a headache not worth
getting into. There would be little improvement in emissions, and it would
only add cost, complexity, and probably hurt performance.
You'd do FAR better adding a catalyst, if clean air is your thing. And those
things are probably easier to install!
In a message dated 6/23/2005 1:44:17 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
s10birdman1966 at yahoo.com writes:
I may have mis-understood the statement..the GM's and chrys FWD's I'm
familiar with use a control solenoid to control vaccum to the egr valve,enabling it
under certain conditions;;i've had to replace a few,because they failed to
close (like at low/idle speeds),causing the engine to run lousy...these
systems could be plumbed to a Corvair engine,but I'm not sure the electronic
controls would be easy enough to make it worth-while...besides,this kind of talk is
sure to get the 'purists' rattling their sabres...TZ
Jim Burkhard <burkhard at rochester.rr.com> wrote:
There are lots on the market (most all of them nowadays, actually), that
aren't diaphragm operated like the old "backpressure valves". Most use
linear stepper motors, but a few use rotary torque motors. In general
though, John is right. They apply EGR for part load (to reduce NOx and
improve mpg) and make it go away at full load so as not to hurt volumetric
efficiency (and thus full load torque).
Jim Burkhard
More information about the VirtualVairs
mailing list