<VV> Re: 140 secondarys

[BobHelt@aol.com]

In a message dated 1/18/05 3:57:14 PM US Mountain Standard Time, 
lewrish@tns.net writes:

> Keep in mind that 66 and late secondary carbs did have an idle circuit, so 
> they 'dribbled' fuel when  not in use.
> 
> Lew 
> 
Lew,
I have no direct knowledge on this, but it is my understanding that the 
Carbmeister (Grant Young) has refuted this subject. After investigating several 
carbs with the so called idle circuit, he has determined that no such circuit was 
ever implements.

Comments from you, or anybody?

Regards,
Bob Helt