<VV> Effect of Reduced Quench on Jet Size and Timimg

Ken Campbell deltainc at grm.net
Wed Aug 17 15:54:07 EDT 2005


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <Mikeamauro at aol.com>
Subject: <VV> Effect of Reduced Quench on Jet Size and Timimg


> I've recently modified a 110, whereas the compression ratio remained
stock,
> but the quench height was reduced to .032. I'm now on a quest to improve
gas mileage from the current 15-mpg..
> Mike Mauro
**********
Hi, I run a stocker 110 with 8^ initial, otherwise a stock curve ... it's a
4sp/3.55 rig, but I get 20 to 30 mpg  ( no air ) ... it's a manual, but that
should be offset because of the 3.55 rear.

15 mpg ... sounds like a turbo (g) ... is your vacuum system advance working
ok?  anyone else out there get 15 mpg on a 110 stocker ???  Geeeze with #49
jets it seems you should be getting a lean 30 mpg or so ..

puzzled in iowuh, ken campbell



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.11/74 - Release Date: 8/17/2005



More information about the VirtualVairs mailing list