<VV> 4 Speed Trans and more
BobHelt at aol.com
BobHelt at aol.com
Fri Apr 15 02:09:50 EDT 2005
In a message dated 4/14/05 11:05:41 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
Larry at forman.net writes:
> Hi Dan,
> While you might not want to hear this, the 64/65 4-speed is MUCH
> better. It would require a new tranny input shaft and larger tranny input
> shaft seal. The synchros last a lot longer and it shifts much better.
>
> -- Larry
>
Full agreement here with Larry's analysis. But be sure to check out the gear
ratios of the '64-65 4-speed and see if you like them, since they are designed
for the 164 cid engine.
Regards,
Bob Helt
More information about the VirtualVairs
mailing list