At 04:23 hours 12/09/2004 -0500, tkalp@cox.net wrote: >If there is more than one Lone Haranguer . . . is he still "Lone"? > ...and would that make him the "penultimate haranguer"? Or, if he was first, would that make him the "early haranguer"? And who would be the "late haranguer"? Now: (wait for it) ...Early haranguers are better than late haranguers. tony.. GD&R