[FC] Hints to confirm or deny original low mileage
Andrew Sego
andrew_sego at yahoo.com
Mon Sep 13 23:37:20 EDT 2010
I've been looking over my new project a lot the past week. I've noticed a few
things that lead me to believe this is an original low mileage vehicle. This
isn't a creampuff vehicle, as it has its own fair share of rust, damage, and
wear. However much of what is wrong with it looks to be from old age and
neglect rather than high mileage. The vehicle came from a farm in southern
Indiana. I still have the PO's registration from 1969.
The odometer reads just over 27K. Normally I would think that means 127K or
that speedometer quit working years ago. I pulled the speedometer cable at the
transaxle and spun it by hand a bit. It's still working and appears to be the
original gray colored cable and not a reproduction.
There is very little wear on the brake and clutch pedal pads. They too look to
be original and not reproduction. I have repro pads on my 63 Corvan so I know
what they look like.
The Briggs and Stratton key still has the knockout in it. This key works in all
four locks.
So far, I have every reason to believe the engine is original. Engine number
T0111V, Differential date is 110, the vehicle serial number is in the
15000's. The engine still has a Delco Remy ignition coil, points, cap and rotor,
and AC 44FF sparkplugs. It still has an AC fuel pump. The oil pressure switch
is still on the side of the crankcase and has never been relocated up to the oil
filter adapter/generator mount. Oil cooler numbers, distributor numbers,
carburetor numbers all jive with being the original parts. Last known vehicle
resigration was 1994. Earliest know registration is 1969. I did a quick
compression test and I have 135 and 140 psi on cylinders 1 and 2. This is with
just a bit of WD-40 down in the cylinders, and the rest of the plugs still in
the engine.
The ball joints are all still rivited in place.
The frame rails and bed are all still very solid...this seems very strange for a
vehicle that has spent the last 40+ years in Indiana winters, unless it was
stored indoors or under roof, OR just wasn't driven on the roads during the
wintertime.
So here comes the question:
What other clues can a guy look for on one of these that might help confirm or
deny whether an indicated low odometer reading is likely actual, flipped, or has
been modifed?
I know a lot of things can happen to a vehicle over 50 years so sometimes it's
hard to tell. What I'm looking for are signs of good indications one way or the
other.
Pictures of this vehicle can be seen at
http://s446.photobucket.com/albums/qq190/whiskey_tango/61%20Rampside/
Thanks!
Andrew Sego
More information about the Corvanatics
mailing list