[FC] Re: Corvanatics Digest, Vol 14, Issue 15

[Chris & Bill Strickland]

-----Original Message-----

>From: corvanatics-bounces at corvair.org
>Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 7:05 AM
>To: corvanatics at corvair.org
>Subject: Re: [FC] Suggestions
>
>Since I haven't been on VV in a while I am not up  on the changes that have 
>been made there. I do remember that being talked about  and a problem over 
>there as well.
>    So what everyone is saying is that the "reply"  button goes to the 
>individual and the "reply all" button goes to the list.
>    A reply here is OK to acknowledge this. If this is  correct then I will 
>see if I can make the change and if I can't then I know  Bryan can.
> 
>    Thanks for all of your suggestions and being  patient with me.
> 
>    Ken Hand
>

You all realize this is two different, but related, topics -- Where the 
replies go, and What should be a private post.

And yes, the first one is primarily a matter of traffic management. The 
second one is a matter of great subjectivity, more like judging Olympic 
ice skating, and I, for one, did not see what was wrong with the post 
that started all this -- yes, it could have been sent privately, but did 
it harm anything sent to the list? No -- all it (& Ken's reply) did was 
generate all this extra traffic about replies and how we post -- was 
that preferable?  Was there Forward Control content in all this? At 
least JR's post was about fc throttle cables ...

Personally, I think Mr Smarti has it right -- "I suppose the sender 
could actually look and check the email address before hitting the send 
button?"

Next, we can talk about keeping the Subject line current ...

etc, ad infinitum --

Bill